Boston's New Labor Blog filled with economic royalists and serfs. A guide to complete sub-minimum wage employment in the new economy. Please support the blog by shopping for products on the right hand column.
Showing posts with label Romney. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Romney. Show all posts
Friday, May 11, 2012
Monday, May 7, 2012
Friday, May 4, 2012
"If Mitt Romney's an economic heavyweight, we're in trouble."
LP - Too much fun.
Monday, April 30, 2012
Sunday, April 29, 2012
Tuesday, April 24, 2012
Monday, April 23, 2012
Just how stupid does Mitt Romney
think we are? If you’ve been following his campaign from the beginning,
that’s a question you have probably asked many times.
But the question was raised with particular force last week, when Mr.
Romney tried to make a closed drywall factory in Ohio a symbol of the
Obama administration’s economic failure. It was a symbol, all right —
but not in the way he intended.
First of all, many reporters quickly noted a point that Mr. Romney somehow failed to mention: George W. Bush, not Barack Obama, was president when the factory in question was closed. Does the Romney campaign expect Americans to blame President Obama for his predecessor’s policy failure?
Yes, it does. Mr. Romney constantly talks about job losses under Mr.
Obama. Yet all of the net job loss took place in the first few months of
2009, that is, before any of the new administration’s policies had time
to take effect. So the Ohio speech was a perfect illustration of the
way the Romney campaign is banking on amnesia, on the hope that voters
don’t remember that Mr. Obama inherited an economy that was already in
free fall.
Full Story: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/23/opinion/krugman-the-amnesia-candidate.html?_r=1
Saturday, April 21, 2012
Massachusetts politicians better know their Sox history
Daily Kos :: News Community Action:
'via Blog this'
'via Blog this'
Mitt cheering with the rabble. I thought this was horse dancing.
Republicans Mitt Romney and Sen. Scott Brown both got a small taste of that this week, leading up to Fenway's 100th birthday. Romney is, of course, there.
"It was probably the first time he's been there," said former Massachusetts governor and 1988 presidential candidate Michael Dukakis. "In jeans of all things," the Democrat said with a sigh.Romney in jeans most Red Sox fans can probably overlook, but this?
Earlier this week Red Sox season-ticket holder Mitt Romney gave a national network interview at Fenway Park. This led someone to bring to my attention that Romney, who was governor at the time, was there at Fenway Park for the historic championship-clinching Game 4 of the 2004 World Series. Or at least, he told an Air Force pilot he was:There's Romney pulling a Romney, one of those bizarre lies—in this article David Bernstein calls them the "Zelig" lies after the Woody Allen character, desperate to fit in—that he must think makes him relatable to people.
When he told me he was Massachusett's governor, I politely asked him to leave the flight deck, declaring the cockpit off limits to all Red Sox fans. He laughed and made a few cracks my way, regarding the Yanks, and we hit it off pretty well. I asked him if he was at Fenway when the Sox finally won the World Series, and with a huge boyish grin he replied, "Yes I was."No, he wasn't. I could go to a lot of trouble proving to you that Romney was actually in New Hampshire campaigning for George W. Bush that day, but it doesn't really matter because—as every New Englander has been screaming while reading this post—Game 4 was played at Busch Stadium in St. Louis, Missouri.
Then there's Scott Brown, whose grasping for Red Sox credibility took a big beating this week. First, there was his radio ad commemorating Fenway's centennial and praising the team for staying put when other powerful forces were trying to shut down the park and move the team outside of Boston. What Brown failed to mention, of course, and which every media outlet in town gleefully brought up, was that he was one of the people pushing for a new stadium from his position in the state senate. Oops.
Not as big of an "oops," perhaps, as his subsquent and unapologetic acceptance of the maximum possible campaign contribution from head of the enemy camp, Randy Levine, president of the New York Yankees. His excuse was as bad as the donation itself:
“We’re happy to accept Randy Levine’s donation,” Brown campaign spokesman Colin Reed said. “The way Scott Brown looks at it is, this is their way of paying us back for Babe Ruth.”Really? Scott Brown is just like Babe Ruth? That'll go over well with the crowd.
Who can tell the difference?
The bats probably aluminum at that
Friday, April 20, 2012
Thursday, April 19, 2012
Wednesday, April 18, 2012
Tuesday, April 17, 2012
Titanic Tax Shirking by Those in First Class | | AlterNet
Titanic Tax Shirking by Those in First Class | | AlterNet:
'via Blog this'
'via Blog this'
Taxes are for suckers
President Obama’s 2011 income tax documents showed on Friday that he paid a significantly higher rate than the significantly richer Mitt Romney, highlighting the titanic level of tax shirking committed by far too many 1 percenters.
President Obama paid 20.5 percent on earnings of $789,674. The President’s total income is the amount Romney raked in every two weeks last year, for a total of $21 million. Romney, the likely GOP presidential nominee, has estimated he’ll pay a tax rate of only 15.4 percent. Romney is among the millionaires and billionaires – the 1 percenters – enjoying the lowest levels in 50 years. Some pay nothing!
4-17-12 Ted Nugent on The Dana Show
I think it's more than the Nazis and Klan who hate you. Such a shame such a law and order guy can't be employed in Afghanistan and Iraq. Poor Ted Nugent. It turns out he's the victim again. Go ahead and cry big salty tears.
Monday, April 16, 2012
Mitt Romney Outlines Policy Details At Closed-Door Fundraiser, Suggests Eliminating 'Some' Departments
Mitt Romney Outlines Policy Details At Closed-Door Fundraiser, Suggests Eliminating 'Some' Departments:
'via Blog this'
'via Blog this'
In a closed-door speech to donors at a private home in Florida on Sunday, Mitt Romney was unusually candid about his policy plans, offering details about what he expects to implement if elected president in November.
According to NBC News, the former Massachusetts governor said he may decide to eliminate several government agencies, including the Department of Housing and Urban Development, which was once led by his father, George Romney.
"I'm going to take a lot of departments in Washington, and agencies, and combine them. Some eliminate, but I'm probably not going to lay out just exactly which ones are going to go," Romney said. "Things like Housing and Urban Development, which my dad was head of, that might not be around later."
Although Romney refused to make specific calls about each agency, he did suggest that the Department of Education would see major changes under a Romney presidency.
"I will either consolidate with another agency, or perhaps make it a heck of a lot smaller," Romney said. "I'm not going to get rid of it entirely," explaining that to do so could be a political pitfall and would eliminate a way to push back on powerful teacher unions.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
