Boston's New Labor Blog filled with economic royalists and serfs. A guide to complete sub-minimum wage employment in the new economy. Please support the blog by shopping for products on the right hand column.
Showing posts with label Mitt Romney. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mitt Romney. Show all posts
Sunday, August 19, 2012
I have a friend of the blog who has voted Republican 40 of the last 44 years and he'd like to see Romney's tax returns. Can you help?
Hi
I apologies if this insults your sensibilities, however having voted straight Republican for 40 out of 44 years, I believe I am not that I'm not being partisan in my beliefs at this point.
The whole country is in peril because of the Bush tax cuts and the loopholes in the tax code. A man who we may hire as President has money in three different countries, I believe to evade taxes. Contrary to tradition he has released only one complete tax return. I want a man running for the highest office to have keep the law..His behavior makes me think he hasn't . .
That's why I created a petition to Mitt Romney, Candidate for President, which says:
"Mitt, you want the people of the USA to hire you. We want to see five years of tax returns. This is one of the things that will help us to believe in you. Ronald Reagan famously said, Trust and Verify!"
Will you sign this petition? Click here:
http://signon.org/sign/mitt-realease-five-years?source=c.em.mt&r_by=5339040
If you are signing this petition, please forward it to some of your friends.
Thursday, August 16, 2012
The state of the GOP: Team Romney-Ryan 2012
Mitt Romney is a terrible politician. He has been given to the country by Wall Street and high finance: you know the people who actually make decisions for the country from the shadows. In nearly every southern primary Romney was rejected by the south (the beating heart of the modern GOP), at least every primary where his challenger was able to figure out how to get on the ballot. The people bankrolling his campaign didn't really seem to care whether the south wanted him or not. They got Mitt Romney just the same. It really was decided for them before they ever went to the polls.
All's Romney had to do in the general election was show up say "I'm here to replace Obama", give no opinion on anything, spout platitudes, and wait for chief justice Roberts to hand him the keys to the white house. He has been such a bad politician putting his foot in his mouth on nearly every stop along the way, while looking like he's totally repulsed even having to stand beside ordinary Americans, and looking like he possess no principle that he isn't willing to change ten minutes later. This includes even making his latest choice of Paul Ryan for vice-president, to appease the right; only to reject Paul Ryan's plan fifteen minutes later, while trying to etch a sketch his way to the middle. Romney has proven to be the equivalent of a political Gumby talking whatever position you want, whenever you want him to take it.
On nearly every issue you can guarantee that at one point or another Mitt Romney has been both for and against it. He's proven to be an abortion loving...cheesy grits eating...professional candidate who hates politics though who has really done nothing for the last twenty years of his life but run for elected office... and whose major core principle is that he believes the trees in Michigan are just the right height.
Romney entered the race with all kinds of advantages. All's he had to do was shut and say he was reasonably sure he wasn't a Kenyan . Instead he allowed the conversation to turn into one about Mitt's missing tax returns which he's proven willing to go to the mat for to keep the public from knowing what's there in a manner that he won't defend any core principle (but trust him there is nothing embarrassing there after all he's looked for you)... or what has happened to the workers in factories that the company that paid for his lavish lifestyle took over and (though he believes in no free hand-outs for the poor) which keep sending him large checks for doing nothing though he can't r even figure out why they are doing it ...and healthcare in Massachusetts that he passed which would have allowed all those laid-off workers to have some protection if they lived in his state (though if he's president he'll dismantle within the first day in office).
Now that he's managed to get almost no one excited behind him, this human chameleon has added the boy wizard, Paul Ryan, to his team. A congressman who shares a bed with a lobbyist both figuratively, literally, and in every way possible. The question that American need to think of is whether this former lobbyist and her husband, who appears as comfortable being lobbied as his wife is lobbying him,will be willing to have a different opinion than that of their client list. If the voters who support him have a different opinion from the companies he and his wife have worked for in the past, who will they stand up for? In the past decade alone Ryan's on wealth has increased by 75%. http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/ryans-fortune-has-increased-in-past-decade-nb6f6ql-165879436.html) These well connected individual have allowed Ryan and his family to move into the old Parker Pen mansion: who have since taken their operations over to China (http://www.scottwalker.org/news/2009/08/janesvilles-former-parker-pen-plant-may-close-153-jobs-would-be-lost) leaving their former Diggs to their loyal government lackeys, like the junior partners in the government businesses nexus that is literally destroying this country. Having nice houses like this allows politicians like Ryan to pretend he they really are just as powerful as the patrons who he so slavishly serves.
Ryan's Parker home: under new managment
When it comes to changing the tax code who will Paul Ryan and his wife listen to the American people - complete with their tricorner hats and pitch forks who have nothing but most the easily replaceable thing to offer: their votes; or will they listen to their former clients - the Pharmaceutical industry, the Oil industry (Conoco and Marathon Oil) or the big health insurance companies (Blue Cross Blue Shield and Cigna) The American public might want to change the tax code, a flat tax comes to mind, but the tax code has been working out pretty well for his client list and, indirectly, it's been working out pretty nicely for the Ryans too.
Who will they listen to the Tea Party signs
Or friends with benefits
Then this career politician (14 years or one third of his life as a "public servant" special emphasis on servant) runs against Washington, the very institution that he's suckled at for over a decade and which bought him all these nice things. Washington is suddenly the problem, from looking at his house it looks more like his personal solution to me, as his whole career has been nothing but acting as a personal conduit for business getting policies they want out of Washington. It's a perfect cynical policy put forth by a man who voted for the Bush tax cuts, two unfunded wars, an unpaid prescription benefit that is killing Medicare (causing him to have to destroy Medicare to save it), the bank bail out (but now wants de-regulate the banks allowing them to take even greater risks), and is listed by many in the media as a serious thinker with regard to economic issues (though his plan does nothing to cut the deficit but raises it)...Ryan is portrayed as some great thinker with serious ideas rather than as a guy who escaped from a lunatic asylum who babbles and imagines himself as a great thinker.
Another great thinker with serious ideas promoted by the media
Good luck tea party: in taking taking your country back. Your corrupted champions are here to help you. Just don't read too much, think too much, and really let's get to the biggest question that America wants an answer to has Obama ever really produced that birth certificate? I mean the long form
Sunday, August 12, 2012
Under Paul Ryan’s Plan, Mitt Romney Would Pay Virtually No Taxes | TPM2012
Under Paul Ryan’s Plan, Mitt Romney Would Pay Virtually No Taxes | TPM2012:
'via Blog this'
'via Blog this'
Democrats have speculated that Mitt Romney might have paid little to no taxesin the years covered in his unreleased tax returns. If Paul Ryan had his way, they’d be right.
Romney’s new running mate proposed eliminating the capital gains tax in his 2010 “Roadmap for America’s Future.” Since Romney, like many ultra-wealthy Americans, derives virtually all of his income from investments, he would pay virtually no taxes at all under such a plan.
The Atlantic crunched the numbers on Romney’s 2010 tax returns, the only one he’s made public, and found that Romney’s tax rate that year would be just 0.82 percent under Ryan’s proposal.
Romney went out of his way during the campaign to avoid proposing any capital gains tax cuts that would benefit him personally, keenly aware that his investment fortune made him an easy target for Democrats. He did propose tax cuts on investment income, but said they would be restricted only to middle-class savings, leaving his own vast holdings unaffected.
The capital gains issue came up during the primaries when Romney attacked Newt Gingrich’s tax plan by noting it would reduce his own tax burden to 0 percent:
“Under that plan, I’d have paid no taxes in the last two years,” Romney said in a January debate, referring to its elimination of taxes on investment.
Ryan also may have recognized the political difficulties behind his idea. While his 2010 proposal put him on the political map, he chose not to zero out capital gains in his House budget.
Given Democratic enthusiasm for Romney’s personal finances and President Obama’s focus on tax fairness, Ryan’s earlier capital gains pitch is likely to rear its head on the trail.
Full story here: http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/08/under-paul-ryans-plan-mitt-romney-would-pay-virtually-no-taxes.php?ref=fpnewsfeed
Saturday, August 11, 2012
Thanks Jerry: In the Superrich, Clues to Romney’s Tax Returns - Common Sense - NYTimes.com
In the Superrich, Clues to Romney’s Tax Returns - Common Sense - NYTimes.com
LP: Latest edition of taxes are for suckers.
On the face of it, Senator Harry Reid’s explosive but flimsily sourced claim that Mitt Romney paid no income tax seems preposterous. Mr. Romney has denied it, and without his returns no one can say for sure. But for someone who makes millions of dollars a year, would it even be possible?
LP: Latest edition of taxes are for suckers.
On the face of it, Senator Harry Reid’s explosive but flimsily sourced claim that Mitt Romney paid no income tax seems preposterous. Mr. Romney has denied it, and without his returns no one can say for sure. But for someone who makes millions of dollars a year, would it even be possible?
¶Evidently it is.
¶It so happens that this summer the Internal Revenue Service released data from the 400 individual income tax returns reporting the highest adjusted gross income. This elite ultrarich group earned on average $202 million in 2009, the latest year available. And buried in the data is the startling disclosure that six of the 400 paid no federal income tax.
¶The I.R.S. has never before disclosed that last fact.
¶Not even Mr. Romney, with reported 2010 income of $21.7 million, qualifies for membership in this select group of 400. But the data provides a window into the financial lives and tax rates of the superrich. Since the I.R.S. doesn’t release data for the tiny percentage of Americans at Mr. Romney’s income level, the 400 are the closest proxy.
¶And that data demonstrates that many of the ultrarich can and do reduce their tax liability to very low levels, even zero. Besides the six who paid no federal income tax, the I.R.S. reported that 27 paid from zero to 10 percent of their adjusted gross incomes and another 89 paid between 10 and 15 percent, which is close to the 13.9 percent rate that Mr. Romney disclosed that he paid in 2010. (At the other end of the spectrum, 82 paid 30 to 35 percent. None paid more than 35 percent.) So more than a quarter of the people earning an average of over $200 million in 2009 paid less than 15 percent of their adjusted gross income in taxes.
The Republican Right Gets What it Wanted: A Ryan-Romney Ticket | The Nation
The Republican Right Gets What it Wanted: A Ryan-Romney Ticket | The Nation:
'via Blog this'
LP: The right wing in ascendancy as it leaves the 21st century. The next stop the 19th century.
Story originally Published here: http://www.thenation.com/blog/169353/paul-ryan-covers-romneys-right-flank#
'via Blog this'
LP: The right wing in ascendancy as it leaves the 21st century. The next stop the 19th century.
It takes a special talent to blow the introduction of your running-mate. But Mitt Romney's got what it takes.
So it was that the presumptive Republican nominee for president told thousands of cheering supporters that Paul Ryan is "the next president of the United States."
For now, Ryan is merely slated to be the Republican nominee for vice president.
But Romney's gaffe was telling.
With the selection of the House Budget Committee chairman as his ticket-mate, Romney has bowed -- not a tip of the head here, a full bow -- to the party's conservative establishment and to grassroots right-wingers who demand not electability but absolute purity.
That’s a more significant shift than it might seem. The Romney campaign plan was supposed to follow classic GOP lines: run to the right in the primaries and then, with the nomination secured, pivot at least a little bit toward the center. Even as he battled Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum in the winter and spring, Romney tried to maintain a measure of ideological maneuverability
No more.
Romney has deferred, fully, to the right.
Until just a few days ago, Ryan was considered an unlikely prospect for the No. 2 spot on the Republican ticket: too rigid in his budgetary obsessions, too wacky in his enthusiasm for Ayn Rand’s novels and Austrian economics, too enthusiastic about taking apart Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.
Romney likes Ryan personally -- enjoying the frat-boy comaraderie that they displayed while campaigning together before Wisconsin's April primary -- but there was never any doubt that he and his team had their doubts about whether they wanted to let the more dynamic and ideologically-pure Ryan define not just the ticket but a potential Romney-Ryan presidency.
It was the right that wanted Ryan on the ticket.
And the right got what it wanted.
In the end, Romney had to bow in order to secure a base that despises President Obama but that never had much taste for the formerly centrist former governor of the only state that backed George McGovern for president in 1972. There was a lingering fear that, as with the Bushes, Romney might go "off message" on them.
Those fears surfaced -- "big time," as Dick Cheney would put it -- as the Romney was finished the vice-presidential selection process.
The first days of August found conservatives entertaining serious doubts about whether Mitt Romney is really one of them. First, one of Romney’s top aides, Andrea Saul, got caught talking up Romneycare (the Massachusetts version of Obamacare) as a cure for what ails the uninsured. Right-wing columnist Ann Coulter responded by calling Saul a “moron,” demanding that Romney fire the spokeswoman.
“Anyone who donates to Mitt Romney, and I mean the big donors, ought to say if Andrea Saul isn’t fired and off the campaign tomorrow, they are not giving another dime, because it is not worth fighting for this man if this is the kind of spokesman he has,” Coulter told Sean Hannity on Fox News Wednesday night. “There’s no point in you doing your show, there’s no point in going to the convention and pushing for this man if he’s employing morons like this.”
Ouch.
But the bigger “ouch” moment came the same day, when it was revealed that the Romney camp had tapped World Bank president Robert Zoellick to head the presumptive Republican presidential nominee’s foreign-policy transition team. Right-wing Republicans dislike Zoellick—a lot—because he is considered a foreign-policy “realist,” with internationalist tendencies. American Enterprise Institute vice president Danielle Pletka described Zoellick as an establishment guy, he’s a trade-first guy. He’s basically a George H.W. Bush old-school Republican.”
On the Republican right, that’s about the same as calling Zoellick an Obama man. Conservative commentators are in full gripe.
What was Mitt to do?
How could he put an end to the debate about whether an until-recently-pro-choice "Massachusetts moderate" could really be trusted by the true believers of the contemporary conservative movement?
The pressure on Romney to pick the right-wing favorite for vice president increased as concerns about Romney’s right-wing bona fides rose.
Ryan was endorsed by the editorial pages of the Wall Street Journal and The Weekly Standard. Even Newt Gingrich, who once ridiculed Ryan’s economic policies as “right-wing social engineering ,” said Ryan might just be the guy.
Through it all, Ryan gave no ground, sent no moderating signals. The 42-year-old Budget Committee chairman remained the steadily controversial figure he has been over the past several years -- thanks, largely (but not entirely), to his advocacy of policies that would lead to the dismantling of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. Inside the Romney camp, by all accounts, this fact was duly noted.
But if Romney wanted to get the base in place, he could not opt for a narcoleptic prospect such as former Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty or Ohio Senator Rob Portman.
As the presidential candidate admitted, he needed a running mate who would add “something to the political discourse about the direction of the country.”
Translation: Romney needed to confirm his conservative credibility.
Ryan met the ideological litmus tests of the Republican purists. Yes, he is a politician. Yes, he is "DC." But he is also, at least at this point, the Grand Old Party's philosopher prince. And his philosophy is not just in synch with the thinking of the Republican right. Ryan embraces and at times defines that thinking.
As ardent social conservative, arguably to the right of Romney on issues such as gay rights and a woman’s right to choose, he was acceptable in ways that other dynamic prospects, such as former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, were not. A stalwart on the side of the military-industrial complex who never met a war or a military budget that he didn’t like, and who -- despite that nice-guy image -- has always been willing to mouth extreme talking points about “foreign” threats, he was for the neo-con establishment far more acceptable than "worldly" contenders such as former Ambassador Jon Huntsman or New Jersey Governor Chris Christie. And of course, Ryan was, and is,ever at the ready to promote the fiscal fantasies favored by the hedge fund managers, big bankers and insurance industry interests that fund the vast right-wing infrastructure.
So Ryan passes muster. In the face of the challenges facing Romney at this late stage in a campaign that has had a very bad summer, that was been enough to make him Romney’s pick. As Romney and his team worried about keeping its right flank satisfied, Ryan’s stock rose—rapidly. On Saturday, it will moved him to the No. 2 spot on the 2012 Republican ticket.
Ryan seized the moment, adding star power and rhetorical muscle to the announcement on the USS Wisconsin Saturday morning.
Romney bumbled the introduction.
But Ryan nailed it, earning the loudest applause of the day with a Reagan-esque declaration that: "America is more than just a place...it's an idea. It's the only country founded on an idea. 'Our rights come from nature and God, not government.' We promise equal opportunity, not equal outcomes."
That's a line straight from the gospels of the Republican right. Romney has tried to deliver it throughout the campaign. Ryan succeeded. And the crowd went wild.
Indeed, they responded as if Ryan really was "the next president of the United States."
The problem, of course, is that while Ryan speaks the language of the right, and while the Republican ticket is now fully and firmly committed to that run on not on Romney's talking points but on Ryan's, the Romney-Ryan ticket is going to need a lot more than the purists to win an election that just became a referendum on Ryanism.
Romney will top the ticket. But Ryan is more than a running-mate. He is the defining figure for the Republicans from here on out -- a development that deligted Democrats who could not quite decide whether the word "radical" or "extreme" better described the ticket. That defining will go way beyond issues of Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security. On every issue that you can imagine, from reproductive rights to environmental protection to labor rights, Ryan is stands to the right. Way to the right.
The Ryan selection moves the Grand Old Party harder to the right than at any time since 1964, when the true believers got a nominee, a platform and 39 percent of the vote. America's more divided now. The Romney-Ryan ticket will run better than Goldwater and Bill Miller did 48 years ago, But by bending so far toward the base, Romney has given the Democrats an opportunity to dream not just of winning but of winning bigger than anyone dared imagine 48 weeks or even 48 days ago.
That's because they are no longer running against Romney and a ticketmate. They are running against a pairing that, defintionally if not officially, would better be described as the Ryan-Romney ticket.
Wednesday, August 1, 2012
Sunday, July 22, 2012
Tuesday, July 17, 2012
Thursday, June 21, 2012
Mitt what happened to self-deportation?
Mitt in the primary pro-self-deportation
Mitt is running the old "give us your tired and your poor" statue of liberty play for the general election
Mitt is running the old "give us your tired and your poor" statue of liberty play for the general election
Welcome Amigos to the melting pot and I hope you remembered to bring your votes
Wednesday, June 20, 2012
Monday, June 18, 2012
Mitt Romney Doesn't Answer Immigration Question 4 TIMES! But he wants a long term solution
hahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
Thursday, June 14, 2012
Wednesday, June 13, 2012
Fewer of Me: the public sector workers who don't matter.
If your house is on fire, there is a crime, or your kid needs an education try to go to a vulture capitalist to do it.
Tuesday, June 12, 2012
Saturday, June 9, 2012
Obama's radical idea teachers matter when it comes to education. Shocking
For more on the GOP's war on knowing things. http://laborspains.blogspot.com/2011/08/americas-love-affair-with-ignorance.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

