Showing posts with label campaign contributions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label campaign contributions. Show all posts

Friday, May 11, 2012

This is not about just government workers. It's about all labor. Scott Walker Promised $500K Donor He Would 'Divide and Conquer' Unions | The Nation

Scott Walker Promised $500K Donor He Would 'Divide and Conquer' Unions | The Nation:

'via Blog this'

Walker's 500k sugar momma


Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker has long denied that he has a secret strategy to destroy public-sector unions as part of a long-term plan to make Wisconsin a “right-to-work” state where unions are dramatically weakened.
But, with the recall election that could replace Walker barely three weeks away, a remarkable videotape of the governor describing just such as a strategy has surfaced. In it, Walker is seen promising a billionaire campaign donor that the attack on collective-bargaining rights for public-sector unions—which sparked demonstrations and the movement that has forced the recall election—was only “the first step” in a grand plan.
The billionaire would eventually give Walker more than $500,000—the largest donation in Wisconsin history—to help him advance his agenda. That donation made her the largest single donor to the governor's effort to beat the June 5 recall vote.
The videotape, shot on January 18, 2011, just days after Walker was sworn in as Wisconsin's Republican governor and several weeks before he proposed to use a “budget repair” bill to gut union rights, was released Thursday by the documentary filmmaker who filmed it.
The video is part of a documentary, As Goes Janesville, which will be shown this fall at film festivals and at PBS stations. (Full disclosure: filmmaker Brad Lichtenstein filmed me several times as part of the making of the documentary. I did not, however, know about the Walker footage until he shared it this week with theMilwaukee Journal Sentinel.)
In he video, Walker is shown meeting with Beloit billionaire Diane Hendricks before an economic development session at a the headquarters of a firm Hendricks owns, ABC Supply Inc., in Beloit.
After Walker kisses Henricks, she asks: “Any chance we'll ever get to be a completely red state and work on these unions?”
“Oh, yeah!” says Walker.
Henricks then asks: “And become a right-to-work [state]?”
Walker repliesWell, we're going to start in a couple weeks with our budget adjustment bill. The first step is we're going to deal with collective bargaining for all public employee unions, because you use divide and conquer.… That opens the door once we do that.”
In a transcript of raw footage from the conversation, Hendricks asks Walker if he has a role model. Walker replies that he has high regard for Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels, who early in his term used an executive order to strip collective bargaining rights away from public employees and who, more recently, signed right-to-work legislation. Walker described the use of the executive order to undermine union rights as a "beautiful thing" and bemoaned the fact that he would have to enact legislation to achieve the same end in Wisconsin.
Like Walker, Daniels said during his election campaigns and early in his tenure that he would not support right-to-work legislation. But he changed course and championed the anti-union initiative after first disempowering -- some would say "dividing and conquering" -- the public-employee unions.
Though he has become known nationally as a militant foe of unions, Walker has always denied that he attacked public-sector unions to achieve a political end. He has also denied that he would seek to enact the sort of “right to work” legislation that has been used in southern states to prevent unionization in the private sector.
His recall opponent, Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett, has said he believes that Walker has a long-term anti-union strategy and that it is part of a broader plan to divide the state for political purposes. In the video, there's no mistaking the fact that Walker is engaging in a conversation about making Wisconsin a “completely red [Republican] state” by attacking unions.
And he is doing so with Hendricks, a notoriously anti-union employer, who would donate $10,000 to Walker's campaign just days after the January 18, 2011, conversation. A year later, as the recall loomed, she would up the ante with that $500,000 donation—making her the top donor to the embattled governor.
Though Hendricks did not respond to calls from the Journal Sentinel and other news outlets for comment, it is fair to say that she must have liked what she heard from Walker. And she must have been pleased his “first step” in the “divide and conquer” strategy of attacking Wisconsin unions.
originally posted here:  http://www.thenation.com/blog/167840/scott-walker-promised-500k-donor-he-would-divide-and-conquer-unions

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Scott Walker's Fundraising Aided By Out-Of-State Super PAC Donors

Scott Walker's Fundraising Aided By Out-Of-State Super PAC Donors:

'via Blog this'


LP - Christmas comes early to Wisconsin for Scotty Walker as long as it isn't those out of state union thugs.



WASHINGTON -- Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) made headlines on Monday when he announced that he had pulled in an unprecedented $13.2 million in three months to fend off a Democratic attempt to recall him from office. His campaign said "grassroots donors" had boosted his haul, with 76.4 percent of the contributions coming from donations totalling $50 or less.
But a closer analysis of his contributions by The Huffington Post shows that Walker was aided by individuals outside the Badger State, as well as by deep-pocketed donors who are fueling the conservative super PACs that have become major players in national races. Two-thirds of Walker's donations came from outside of Wisconsin, and $3.57 million came from individuals giving $10,000 or more.

Monday, April 30, 2012

Scott Walker Raises $13 Million In Three Months For Recall Battle

Scott Walker Raises $13 Million In Three Months For Recall Battle:

'via Blog this'

I'm sure all that money came from within Wisconsin



WASHINGTON -- Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) pulled in $13 million in the most recent three-month reporting period to fight off a Democratic attempt to recall him from office, an unprecedented sum of money for a gubernatorial race in the state.
Walker's campaign announced on Monday that it has raised a total of $25 million since Jan. 1, 2011. It now has nearly $4.8 million on hand for recall and general election funds.
“We continue to see strong grassroots support for Governor Walker, his bold reforms, and his plans for moving Wisconsin forward,” said Walker spokeswoman Ciara Matthews. "Because of the overwhelming support for the Governor, we can continue to speak to voters about how Governor Walker plans to move Wisconsin forward while his Democrat opponents plan to take Wisconsin backwards to higher taxes, record job loss, and massive deficits."

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

Who they work for?



Sometimes I wonder why when I vote for somebody different I end up getting more of the same. The key to understanding this as best as I can tell is to look at who contributed to whom in the last election cycle. Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, JP Morgan, and the US government contributed lots of money to both sides. I guess Goldman Sachs is not satisfied with contributing a bevy of executives right into the US treasury they also feel they need to buy both sides too. In the election cycle before, you could add Bank of America to that list. Who knows what Obama did to piss of BOA?

"They’ve got a set of Republican waiters on one side and a set of Democratic waiters on the other side, but no matter which set of waiters brings you the dish, the legislative grub is all prepared in the same Wall Street kitchen." -- Louisiana's Huey Long 1936.

The Democrats has plenty of large university money coming (Harvard, University of California, Columbia) as well as intuitions who have a lot to gain from the whole "supposed education accountability" movement (Microsoft, IBM, Kaplan testing (who is really just the Washington Post) This mean that you could expect little action that would restrict these companies or institutions from getting their hands on the "free" public school dollars. All educators need PDPs (Professional development Points) which is direct money right into the university coffers. Now some universities are even directly taking over school systems look at BU taking over Chelsea's school system (Massachusetts)

The Republican are in hock to just about every financial institution there is . Which leads one to wonder why the Democrats are even sweating the debt ceiling. The banking industry is unlikely to let the US default on the debt ceiling. They'll just bring in their Republican employees and give them a good talking to.

Also contributing to the the Republicans was Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearn. I guess the two bankrupt companies felt obligated to write checks to their political benefactors write to the bitter end. One has the feeling that the people writing those checks might not have been the ones in front of the computer screen who lost their jobs. They just disappeared and will reemerge under another guise. As Don Draper from Mad Men said

Don Draper: "The product is good. It's high quality. Dogs love it, but the name is poisoned."
Client: "That name got us where we are. Do you think that was just luck?"
Don Draper: "I'm not saying a new name is easy to find. And we will give you a lot of options. But it's a label on a can. And it will be true because it will promise the quality of the product that's inside." -- Mad Men, episode 3.11

One man or one woman is cheap: it adds up to just one vote. Money is everything. As long as some of the policies aren't too odorous, you can flood the airwaves with endless BS to dupe the voters and keep the same unchanging system in place.


From Open Secrets website:

Democrats Obama’s leading contributors

University of California
$1,591,395
$994,795
Harvard University
$854,747
$833,617
Google Inc
$803,436
$701,290
$695,132
$590,084
Sidley Austin LLP
$588,598
Stanford University
$586,557
National Amusements Inc
$551,683
$543,219
Wilmerhale Llp
$542,618
$530,839
IBM Corp
$528,822
Columbia University
$528,302
$514,881
$499,130
US Government
$494,820
Latham & Watkins
$493,835

Republican McCain’s leading contributors

$373,595
$322,051
$273,452
$230,095
$228,107
US Government
$208,379
$201,438
$195,063
$192,493
$183,353
$167,900
US Army
$167,820
$166,026
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher
$159,596
Blank Rome LLP
$154,226
Greenberg Traurig LLP
$146,437
US Dept of Defense
$144,105
$131,974
$117,498
$114,357


Democrat Kerry Presidential Contributors 2004

University of California
$622,925
Harvard University
$355,359
$305,824
$303,250
$288,631
$278,597
$264,077
US Government
$229,976
UBS Americas
$219,700
JP Morgan Chase & Co
$207,065
DLA Piper Rudnick et al
$204,353
Wilmer, Cutler et al
$203,386
Stanford University
$195,899
IBM Corp
$189,390
Viacom Inc
$182,996
$180,979
Robins, Kaplan et al
$177,650
Columbia University
$175,592
$169,502
$159,031


Republican Bush Presidential Contributors 2004

$600,480
$580,004
$513,750
UBS Americas
$472,075
$390,600
$356,350
$331,040
$329,725
$320,620
$309,150
$305,140
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
$290,450
US Government
$287,636
$275,310
Ameriquest Capital
$250,650
Blank Rome LLP
$223,900
$218,261
$212,920
Cendant Corp
$207,443
JP Morgan Chase & Co
$205,900